This is a sponsored article from SustainabilityTracker.com member ForestOne.
The construction of residential and commercial buildings, and other infrastructure have a significant impact on people and the environment. The built environment requires the use of land, materials and energy, which in turn leads to greenhouse gas emissions and the production of other wastes. In fact, emissions from the building sector hit their highest-ever level in 2019. Beyond that, there is also the human impact, especially the people involved throughout the construction process are sometimes vulnerable to exploitation or are exposed to unnecessary risks to their health and safety. Buildings themselves may be harmful to human health through poor design or the use of toxic building materials. It is our obligation to make a responsible choice and contribute to the sustainability of our ecosystem.
Assessing the health and environmental impacts of materials is a challenge faced by all. It is a process that is further complicated by varying claims from product manufacturers, and the lack of definitive, industry-accepted processes for specifying responsibly. At a minimum, responsible specification requires research, critical evaluation and common sense. Below are some guides to help you make a responsible choice.
Each product/material is subject to a wide range of factors that affect its sustainability, environmental performance & social impact, including:
Performance – meeting the project’s requirements for performance (e.g., durability, structural integrity, thermal performance, acoustic performance, etc.).
Environmental product information – the manufacturer should be transparent about its environmental performance and provide the appropriate environmental product and health information on request.
Code compliance – meeting the requirements of local building codes and standards (e.g., ensuring that the buildings are safe, healthy, energy efficient and suitable for local climate).
Maintenance requirements – products/materials that are difficult or costly to maintain will more likely need to be repaired or replaced sooner than low-maintenance solutions.
Warranties – the manufacturer should be confident in the longevity of its products and be prepared to provide support to ensure along product lifespan.
It has been salvaged or reclaimed from existing or demolished structures (e.g. reclaimed wood)
Made with natural or renewable resources
Has low ’embodied’ energy or emissions (the energy required to produce and transport the product or material)
Does not contain ozone depleting substances
End-of-life considerations
Product/material is easily reused (either whole or through disassembly)
Readily recycled at the end of its initial life, preferably in a closed-loop recycling system
Biodegradable
Operational considerations
Product/material is long-lasting, durable, with low maintenance requirements
Contributes to energy-efficient building operations (e.g. improves thermal comfort thus reducing our reliance on artificial heating and cooling).
Health and safety
Product/material promotes good indoor air quality (e.g. through containing no volatile organic compounds and/or formaldehyde)
Sourced from ethical resources and manufacturers, preferably local
Non-toxic and poses no threat to human health and safety to any person involved in the project
Tools and resources to make a responsible choice
Several local and international industry and government organisations assure the environmental performance of building products and materials by providing product labelling schemes and standards to be met. Those schemes and standards provide businesses with approval and certification on their environmental performance. Examples of those include:
Environmental Labels and Declarations (ISO 14025:2006);
Sustainability of Construction Works – Environmental Product Declarations (EN 15804);
Good Environmental Choice Australia (GECA); and
Global GreenTag’s GreenRate
Other third-party certification schemes that apply green criteria to specific material types (i.e., wood sourced responsibly from sustainable forests) are typically certified by third-party organisations, such as:
Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification – PEFC (PEFC/21-31-24);
Forest Stewardship Council – FSC® (FSC-C012688); and
Chain of Custody of Wood and Wood-based products (ISO 38200:2018)
Environmental Product Declarations (EPD)
EPD is an independent third-party verified and registered document that communicates transparent comparable data and relevant environmental information about the lifecycle environmental impact of a product. Every EPD is based on a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), which is an assessment of the product’s environmental impact throughout its various life stages, from material and component sourcing through to final disposal or recycling. LCA is conducted based on a standard set of methods and requirements depending on the product category, enabling the EPD to be used as a platform to compare similar products.
Green building rating schemes
Gaining in acceptance worldwide, green building rating schemes establish overall environmental performance criteria for entire buildings. Such schemes provide rating tools voluntarily to assess and recognise buildings that meet certain green requirements or standards. By formalising design and performance criteria, these rating schemes provide a common language and benchmark for sustainable design. Some of the most internationally recognised schemes include:
GreenStar – administered by the Green Building Council in Australia;
The WELL Building Standard – run by the International WELL Building Institute; and
LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) – developed by the non-profit US Green Building Council
Most green building rating schemes will award credits or points for the use of sustainable products and materials that go towards certification. Such schemes will recognise the use of reused materials, recycled-content materials, local or regional materials, renewable materials, certified wood, and low-emitting materials. Points are also awarded for responsible sourcing and supply chain, as well as minimising health risks associated with the manufacture and use of building products.
This is an article from a SustainabilityTracker.com Member. The views and opinions we express here don’t necessarily reflect our organisation.
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Strictly Necessary Cookies
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.